Genetic code could be used to offer ultimate personal care on the NHS
Mark Henderson.
Science Editor
A powerful new approach to reading genetic codes has been tested for the first time in a study that could transform the prospects of personalised medical treatment based on individuals’ DNA.
The technique, developed by British scientists, offers a means of sequencing the human genome much more cheaply and quickly than existing methods. It should be possible to sequence a patient’s entire genetic profile for little more than ?500 within five years, making it affordable to the NHS and private health insurers.
This would allow doctors to use DNA to predict and prevent conditions such as heart disease and diabetes, and to prescribe drugs more effectively.
A landmark test of the technology, known as nanopore sequencing, has confirmed that it can accurately identify the four letters or “bases” of DNA. The findings suggest that it will play a key role in bringing genome sequencing into mainstream medicine, as the head of the world’s leading company in the field predicted in this newspaper two weeks ago. Jay Flatley, the chief executive of Illumina, told The Times that he expected every baby born a decade from now to have its entire genetic code sequenced.
Last month Illumina invested $18 million (?12.6 million) in Oxford Nanopore, the company that developed the technique, and signed an exclusive commercialisation deal.
Gordon Sanghera, chief executive of Oxford Nanopore, said that the results promised a “step-change” in genome sequencing. “This platform will allow us to deliver a genome sequence for $1,000 (?700) or below,” he said. “We’re moving from the information age to the genetic information age, which is really exciting. So many people want to look at their DNA and use it – and this technology has the potential to deliver that.”
DNA sequencing was developed in the 1970s by Fred Sanger, the only Briton to win two Nobel prizes, and the first draft of the human genome was published in 2001 at an estimated cost of $4 billion (?2.7 billion).
New technology has since cut the cost considerably – a company called Complete Genomics announced this month that it would soon be offering sequencing for $5,000 (?3,500) a time – but it remains out of reach of most individuals and health services.
Nanopore sequencing is expected to be much cheaper because it gets around the main problem that has kept the cost of conventional methods so high. These rely on tagging the four DNA letters (A, C, G and T) with fluorescent dyes, and both the chemical needed to stain samples and the cameras needed for reading them are very expensive.
Under the new approach, no tags are used. Individual letters of DNA are instead detached from a strand using a special enzyme, and fired one by one through a tiny biological structure called a nanopore, which contains a hole of less than a tenth of the diameter of a human hair. As the letters move through the nanopore, they block an electrical current that is passed across it. Each letter disrupts the current by a different amount and, by measuring this, it is possible to identify it as A, C, G or T.
Oxford Nanopore has already developed chips containing hundreds of nanopores, which could be used by a machine to sequence huge amounts of DNA quickly and cheaply.
In a paper published in the journal Nature Nanotechnology, scientists from the company have confirmed that the technology can read DNA accurately, without any chemical labelling.
"'I'll make old vases for you if you want them—will make them just as I made these.' He had visions of a room full of golden brown beard. It was the most appalling thing he had ever witnessed, and there was no trickery about it. The beard had actually grown before his eyes, and it had now reached to the second button of the Clockwork man's waistcoat. And, at any moment, Mrs. Masters might return! "Worth stealing," a Society journalist lounging by remarked. "I could write a novel, only I can never think of a plot. Your old housekeeper is asleep long ago. Where do you carry your latchkey?" "Never lose your temper," he said. "It leads to apoplexy. Ah, my fine madam, you thought to pinch me, but I have pinched you instead." How does that strike you, Mr. Smith? Fancy Jerusha Abbott, (individually) ever pat me on the head, Daddy? I don't believe so-- The confusion was partly inherited from Aristotle. When discussing the psychology of that philosopher, we showed that his active Nous is no other than the idea of which we are at any moment actually conscious. Our own reason is the passive Nous, whose identity is lost in the multiplicity of objects with which it becomes identified in turn. But Aristotle was careful not to let the personality of God, or the supreme Nous, be endangered by resolving it into the totality of substantial forms which constitute Nature. God is self-conscious in the strictest sense. He thinks nothing but himself. Again, the subjective starting-point of305 Plotinus may have affected his conception of the universal Nous. A single individual may isolate himself from his fellows in so far as he is a sentient being; he cannot do so in so far as he is a rational being. His reason always addresses itself to the reason of some one else—a fact nowhere brought out so clearly as in the dialectic philosophy of Socrates and Plato. Then, when an agreement has been established, their minds, before so sharply divided, seem to be, after all, only different personifications of the same universal spirit. Hence reason, no less than its objects, comes to be conceived as both many and one. And this synthesis of contradictories meets us in modern German as well as in ancient Greek philosophy. 216 "I shall be mighty glad when we git this outfit to Chattanoogy," sighed Si. "I'm gittin' older every minute that I have 'em on my hands." "What was his name?" inquired Monty Scruggs. "Wot's worth while?" "Rose, Rose—my dear, my liddle dear—you d?an't mean——" "I'm out of practice, or I shouldn't have skinned myself like this—ah, here's Coalbran's trap. Perhaps he'll give you a lift, ma'am, into Peasmarsh." Chapter 18 "The Fair-pl?ace." "Yes," replied Black Jack, "here they are," drawing a parchment from his pocket. "This is the handwriting of a retainer called Oakley." HoME大桥未久AV手机在线观看
ENTER NUMBET 0016www.juhohw.com.cn www.hanabi8.com.cn khizeu.com.cn hmdeyiju.com.cn www.ilijia.com.cn rlchain.com.cn ogato.com.cn mjggc.com.cn tysapi.org.cn wsdtop.com.cn
